https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170333 Regulation 17(3) was construed as giving the Corporation power, not imposing a duty, to offer alternative employment to a medically unfit driver: the first part authorises termination after failure of the fitness test, while the second is only an enabling provision for rehabilitation. The Court held that judicial review cannot compel a statutory authority to exercise discretion in favour of a particular person, though it may require lawful consideration. Circulars that excluded individual assessment were inconsistent with the statutory scheme, so the discretion had to be exercised case by case, reasonably and with regard to rehabilitation and administrative efficiency. en-us Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170333 Regulation 17(3) was construed as giving the Corporation power, not imposing a duty, to offer alternative employment to a medically unfit driver: the first part authorises termination after failure of the fitness test, while the second is only an enabling provision for rehabilitation. The Court held that judicial review cannot compel a statutory authority to exercise discretion in favour of a particular person, though it may require lawful consideration. Circulars that excluded individual assessment were inconsistent with the statutory scheme, so the discretion had to be exercised case by case, reasonably and with regard to rehabilitation and administrative efficiency. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170333