<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 676 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259802</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions made under Sections 68 and 69 and to levy interest as per the provisions of the law. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence before making additions based on documents found during searches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 15:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 676 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259802</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions made under Sections 68 and 69 and to levy interest as per the provisions of the law. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence before making additions based on documents found during searches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>