<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1357 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the conversion of shipping bills under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to mention the license number in their shipping bills for exporting Metallic Expansion Bellow under Free Shipping Bills. Despite providing evidence and citing past instances of similar conversions, the Tribunal emphasized the discretionary nature of power under Section 149 and the risk to revenue posed by the omission. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants&#039; failure to comply with necessary export scheme requirements and learn from past experiences led to the rejection of their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 12:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1357 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the conversion of shipping bills under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to mention the license number in their shipping bills for exporting Metallic Expansion Bellow under Free Shipping Bills. Despite providing evidence and citing past instances of similar conversions, the Tribunal emphasized the discretionary nature of power under Section 149 and the risk to revenue posed by the omission. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants&#039; failure to comply with necessary export scheme requirements and learn from past experiences led to the rejection of their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>