<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (8) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170308</link>
    <description>Section 34A of the Banking Companies Act is addressed as a constitutional restriction on disclosure of specified banking information in industrial adjudication. Article 19(1)(c) protects the formation of associations or unions, but does not guarantee that unions can pursue all objectives, including collective bargaining or strikes, free from legislative regulation. The provision is treated as preserving banking credit structures while retaining industrial adjudication and allowing expert determination of limited withheld information. Its classification of banking companies is presented as having a rational nexus with protecting banking reserves, public confidence and credit structures; the Reserve Bank&#039;s distinct administrative and expert role does not create impermissible discrimination under Article 14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (8) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170308</link>
      <description>Section 34A of the Banking Companies Act is addressed as a constitutional restriction on disclosure of specified banking information in industrial adjudication. Article 19(1)(c) protects the formation of associations or unions, but does not guarantee that unions can pursue all objectives, including collective bargaining or strikes, free from legislative regulation. The provision is treated as preserving banking credit structures while retaining industrial adjudication and allowing expert determination of limited withheld information. Its classification of banking companies is presented as having a rational nexus with protecting banking reserves, public confidence and credit structures; the Reserve Bank&#039;s distinct administrative and expert role does not create impermissible discrimination under Article 14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>