<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 916 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170290</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted where an assessee merely collects an excess amount as excise duty from customers on sale of pre-budget stock and deposits that excess under Section 11D, without any allegation or proof of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty. Section 11AC applies only when the statutory conditions linked to culpable evasion are satisfied. In the absence of such conduct, deposit of the excess amount under Section 11D does not justify penalty under Section 11AC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 17:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 916 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170290</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted where an assessee merely collects an excess amount as excise duty from customers on sale of pre-budget stock and deposits that excess under Section 11D, without any allegation or proof of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty. Section 11AC applies only when the statutory conditions linked to culpable evasion are satisfied. In the absence of such conduct, deposit of the excess amount under Section 11D does not justify penalty under Section 11AC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>