<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules Tribunal Can Extend Stay Beyond 365 Days if Assessee Isn&#039;t Responsible for Appeal Delays.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23040</link>
    <description>Constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) - Vacation of stay order after 365 days - discrimination - where the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee, Tribunal has the power to grant extension of stay beyond 365 days in deserving cases - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 17:32:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 17:32:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules Tribunal Can Extend Stay Beyond 365 Days if Assessee Isn&#039;t Responsible for Appeal Delays.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23040</link>
      <description>Constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) - Vacation of stay order after 365 days - discrimination - where the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee, Tribunal has the power to grant extension of stay beyond 365 days in deserving cases - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 17:32:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>