<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 993 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170284</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on finished goods exported after bringing them to the factory, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Circular No. 283/117/96-CX by CBEC. The denial of credit and imposition of penalty were set aside by the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s credit entitlement based on the relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 993 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170284</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on finished goods exported after bringing them to the factory, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Circular No. 283/117/96-CX by CBEC. The denial of credit and imposition of penalty were set aside by the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s credit entitlement based on the relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>