<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1025 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170285</link>
    <description>Second-hand capital goods cleared on full payment of duty without claiming a Foreign Trade Policy exemption were freely importable under paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2002-07. No re-export bond was legally required. Consequently, a voluntarily executed but unnecessary bond could not create an enforceable re-export obligation, and non-compliance with that condition could not support redemption fine or penalty. In the absence of a violation of the Foreign Trade Policy or the Customs Act, redemption fine and penalty lacked legal basis and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 16:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1025 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170285</link>
      <description>Second-hand capital goods cleared on full payment of duty without claiming a Foreign Trade Policy exemption were freely importable under paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2002-07. No re-export bond was legally required. Consequently, a voluntarily executed but unnecessary bond could not create an enforceable re-export obligation, and non-compliance with that condition could not support redemption fine or penalty. In the absence of a violation of the Foreign Trade Policy or the Customs Act, redemption fine and penalty lacked legal basis and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>