https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170279 The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. due to the use of 'NUCON' indicating a connection with M/s. Nucon Industries Pvt. Ltd. Confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalties were confirmed in Appeal Nos. E/1170 and 1171/2005. However, in Appeal Nos. 328 and 329/2008, the denial of benefit was upheld, but the calculation of cum-duty price was directed to be redone. The invocation of an extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified in the case, leading to the setting aside of impugned orders in E/328 and 329/2008. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2015 14:59:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170279 The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. due to the use of 'NUCON' indicating a connection with M/s. Nucon Industries Pvt. Ltd. Confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalties were confirmed in Appeal Nos. E/1170 and 1171/2005. However, in Appeal Nos. 328 and 329/2008, the denial of benefit was upheld, but the calculation of cum-duty price was directed to be redone. The invocation of an extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified in the case, leading to the setting aside of impugned orders in E/328 and 329/2008. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170279