<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 909 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170274</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on steamer agents for loading export consignments without Let Export Orders. The appeals by the exporter and CHA were successful as they were not involved in the prior shipment and no other contraventions were evident. The redemption fine and confiscation order were both overturned. The responsibility of the CHA regarding the contravention of loading containers without Let Export Orders was also dismissed as the CHA had not instructed the shipping agent to ship the goods without the necessary orders. Both appeals were allowed, and consequential benefits were granted to the appellants, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 909 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170274</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on steamer agents for loading export consignments without Let Export Orders. The appeals by the exporter and CHA were successful as they were not involved in the prior shipment and no other contraventions were evident. The redemption fine and confiscation order were both overturned. The responsibility of the CHA regarding the contravention of loading containers without Let Export Orders was also dismissed as the CHA had not instructed the shipping agent to ship the goods without the necessary orders. Both appeals were allowed, and consequential benefits were granted to the appellants, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>