https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170269 A writ petition was considered unsuitable for deciding competing title claims and sale disputes arising from mortgaged property sold by a Financial Corporation under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. The dispute turned on validity of transfers made during the mortgage period and the respective rights flowing from the private sale and the Corporation's sale, which depended on factual proof and determination of inter se civil rights. Such issues were held to be inappropriate for adjudication in public law proceedings under Article 226, and the parties were to pursue remedies before the competent civil forum. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 11:52:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170269 A writ petition was considered unsuitable for deciding competing title claims and sale disputes arising from mortgaged property sold by a Financial Corporation under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. The dispute turned on validity of transfers made during the mortgage period and the respective rights flowing from the private sale and the Corporation's sale, which depended on factual proof and determination of inter se civil rights. Such issues were held to be inappropriate for adjudication in public law proceedings under Article 226, and the parties were to pursue remedies before the competent civil forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170269