<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 988 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170263</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed on the importer of steel masts for telecom applications, as the Bureau of Indian Standards clarified that certification was not necessary for such products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 12:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 988 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170263</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed on the importer of steel masts for telecom applications, as the Bureau of Indian Standards clarified that certification was not necessary for such products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>