https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170264 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of misdeclared goods but reduced the redemption fine. The demand for recovery of duty and interest on past imports was set aside due to insufficient evidence. Penalties on the importer were upheld for the live consignment, with a remand for quantification. The penalty on the Managing Partner was overturned. Documents obtained through steamer agents were deemed admissible. The plea for re-export was denied, following legal precedent. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 May 2017 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170264 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of misdeclared goods but reduced the redemption fine. The demand for recovery of duty and interest on past imports was set aside due to insufficient evidence. Penalties on the importer were upheld for the live consignment, with a remand for quantification. The penalty on the Managing Partner was overturned. Documents obtained through steamer agents were deemed admissible. The plea for re-export was denied, following legal precedent. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170264