https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170258 The Tribunal directed the appellant, a job worker, to pre-deposit the confirmed duty amount within twelve weeks for not discharging duty liability correctly. The appellant's argument on differential duty calculation under Rule 10A was weighed against the Revenue's position, leading to the decision in favor of pre-deposit pending appeal resolution. The order emphasized the need for a detailed review of the law, considering the manufacturing process and assessable value determination, to balance the interests of both parties. en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2015 11:29:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170258 The Tribunal directed the appellant, a job worker, to pre-deposit the confirmed duty amount within twelve weeks for not discharging duty liability correctly. The appellant's argument on differential duty calculation under Rule 10A was weighed against the Revenue's position, leading to the decision in favor of pre-deposit pending appeal resolution. The order emphasized the need for a detailed review of the law, considering the manufacturing process and assessable value determination, to balance the interests of both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170258