<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 986 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confiscation and penalty under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 due to the absence of mens rea, as per the precedents and legal interpretation provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 11:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 986 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confiscation and penalty under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 due to the absence of mens rea, as per the precedents and legal interpretation provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>