<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 985 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170256</link>
    <description>Imported medical equipment intended for actual use in heart surgery, with no intention to violate import policy, justified a reduced redemption fine because the market-price basis for a higher fine was absent. Penalty on the importer was also unsustainable because the equipment had been supplied free of cost and there was no deliberate act or omission or other culpable conduct. The order upholding reduction of redemption fine and deletion of penalty was sustained in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 11:13:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 985 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170256</link>
      <description>Imported medical equipment intended for actual use in heart surgery, with no intention to violate import policy, justified a reduced redemption fine because the market-price basis for a higher fine was absent. Penalty on the importer was also unsustainable because the equipment had been supplied free of cost and there was no deliberate act or omission or other culpable conduct. The order upholding reduction of redemption fine and deletion of penalty was sustained in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>