<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1019 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170253</link>
    <description>Structural materials such as shapes, sections, plates, hot strip plates and channels used in fabrication and erection of a bio-gas plant were held ineligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, components, spares or accessories, because the plant itself was not shown on the record to be capital goods and the materials were only structural inputs. The claim that the plant was pollution control equipment was not supported by authoritative material. Credit was therefore denied and the duty demand with interest sustained. Where the dispute turned on interpretation of the credit provisions, penalty was not warranted and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 11:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1019 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170253</link>
      <description>Structural materials such as shapes, sections, plates, hot strip plates and channels used in fabrication and erection of a bio-gas plant were held ineligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, components, spares or accessories, because the plant itself was not shown on the record to be capital goods and the materials were only structural inputs. The claim that the plant was pollution control equipment was not supported by authoritative material. Credit was therefore denied and the duty demand with interest sustained. Where the dispute turned on interpretation of the credit provisions, penalty was not warranted and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>