<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 906 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for maintenance charges related to the cost of Acetone used for dissolving Acetylene gas, considering the appellant&#039;s collection of Acetone cost as suppression of facts. The penalty under Section 11AC was upheld, but Modvat credit for duty on Acetone was allowed. The duty demand for maintenance charges was reworked, and the appeal was disposed of with the mentioned modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 11:19:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 906 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for maintenance charges related to the cost of Acetone used for dissolving Acetylene gas, considering the appellant&#039;s collection of Acetone cost as suppression of facts. The penalty under Section 11AC was upheld, but Modvat credit for duty on Acetone was allowed. The duty demand for maintenance charges was reworked, and the appeal was disposed of with the mentioned modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>