https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170252 The show cause notice was confined to technical professional products sold through dealers to salons and alleged ineligibility for assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The adjudicating authority nevertheless expanded the controversy to include retail products and proceeded on the basis that the demand covered goods not actually proposed in the notice. That mismatch between the notice and the adjudication, coupled with the erroneous factual premise, was sufficient at the interim stage to warrant intervention, and the impugned order was stayed. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2015 10:58:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170252 The show cause notice was confined to technical professional products sold through dealers to salons and alleged ineligibility for assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The adjudicating authority nevertheless expanded the controversy to include retail products and proceeded on the basis that the demand covered goods not actually proposed in the notice. That mismatch between the notice and the adjudication, coupled with the erroneous factual premise, was sufficient at the interim stage to warrant intervention, and the impugned order was stayed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170252