<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 668 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the services provided did not fall under the definition of &quot;Scientific and Technical Consultancy Service&quot; as per the Finance Act. The demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal and the rejection of the revenue&#039;s appeal. Other submissions were not addressed as the primary issue was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 668 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the services provided did not fall under the definition of &quot;Scientific and Technical Consultancy Service&quot; as per the Finance Act. The demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal and the rejection of the revenue&#039;s appeal. Other submissions were not addressed as the primary issue was resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>