https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259788 The appeal against the order dated 02.09.2014 passed by CESTAT was dismissed due to non-compliance with the deposit order dated 13.03.2013, requiring a specific amount to be deposited within a set timeframe. The appellant's argument of not being heard during the passing of the order was considered, but as they were granted liberty to pursue remedies against the deposit order, the appeal was disposed of without raising a substantial question of law. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had the opportunity to challenge the order but had not done so. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259788 The appeal against the order dated 02.09.2014 passed by CESTAT was dismissed due to non-compliance with the deposit order dated 13.03.2013, requiring a specific amount to be deposited within a set timeframe. The appellant's argument of not being heard during the passing of the order was considered, but as they were granted liberty to pursue remedies against the deposit order, the appeal was disposed of without raising a substantial question of law. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had the opportunity to challenge the order but had not done so. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259788