<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 649 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259775</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by excluding specific comparables in the transfer pricing adjustment issue, bringing the transactions within the arm&#039;s length range and eliminating the adjustment. Consequently, other issues concerning tax credits, erroneous refund recovery, penalty proceedings, and interest levy became irrelevant following the resolution of the primary transfer pricing matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 649 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259775</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by excluding specific comparables in the transfer pricing adjustment issue, bringing the transactions within the arm&#039;s length range and eliminating the adjustment. Consequently, other issues concerning tax credits, erroneous refund recovery, penalty proceedings, and interest levy became irrelevant following the resolution of the primary transfer pricing matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>