<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 647 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the entitlement to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent year. The revision order passed under section 263 was quashed as the original assessment was upheld, concluding that once additional depreciation is allowed in the initial year, it cannot be denied in subsequent years without valid grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 647 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the entitlement to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent year. The revision order passed under section 263 was quashed as the original assessment was upheld, concluding that once additional depreciation is allowed in the initial year, it cannot be denied in subsequent years without valid grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>