<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259771</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the adjustments made by the TPO/DRP on various grounds and directing further verification where necessary. The tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the business necessity and actual evidence provided by the assessee in determining the arm&#039;s length price of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 22:51:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259771</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the adjustments made by the TPO/DRP on various grounds and directing further verification where necessary. The tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the business necessity and actual evidence provided by the assessee in determining the arm&#039;s length price of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>