<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 644 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, supporting the assessee&#039;s use of the internal TNM Method for benchmarking international transactions, leading to the negation of a transfer pricing adjustment. The issues regarding the selection of comparables and data use became moot. The matter of disallowance of lease rental expenditure was remanded for reconsideration, and the penalty proceedings initiation was not extensively addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 22:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 644 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, supporting the assessee&#039;s use of the internal TNM Method for benchmarking international transactions, leading to the negation of a transfer pricing adjustment. The issues regarding the selection of comparables and data use became moot. The matter of disallowance of lease rental expenditure was remanded for reconsideration, and the penalty proceedings initiation was not extensively addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>