<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 638 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessee&#039;s one-day delay in submitting the physical ITR-V led to non-compliance with Section 139(1), disqualifying the deduction under Section 80IB. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 80AC and the significance of adhering to statutory deadlines, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 638 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessee&#039;s one-day delay in submitting the physical ITR-V led to non-compliance with Section 139(1), disqualifying the deduction under Section 80IB. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 80AC and the significance of adhering to statutory deadlines, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>