https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170218 Interim stay in the appeal was extended because the Larger Bench ruling in IPCL, as upheld by the Supreme Court, supported continuation of protection pending disposal of the appeal. Detention of finished goods was held unsustainable while the application for extension of stay remained pending, as the Board's circular barred coercive action in that situation. The detention order was set aside and release of the goods was directed, with the miscellaneous applications allowed. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2015 18:30:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170218 Interim stay in the appeal was extended because the Larger Bench ruling in IPCL, as upheld by the Supreme Court, supported continuation of protection pending disposal of the appeal. Detention of finished goods was held unsustainable while the application for extension of stay remained pending, as the Board's circular barred coercive action in that situation. The detention order was set aside and release of the goods was directed, with the miscellaneous applications allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170218