<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 431 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170211</link>
    <description>A validating enactment is effective only if the legislature has competence and the statutory defect identified in the earlier decision is actually cured; merely deeming the legal consequence without satisfying the mandatory municipal inclusion requirements is insufficient. Because the prescribed steps for including Raipura and Ummedganj within the Kota municipal limits had not been followed, the validating Act did not remove the foundational illegality. The earlier defect therefore remained, the octroi levy based on that inclusion could not be sustained, and refund of octroi paid after the exempted period with interest was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 14:10:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 431 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170211</link>
      <description>A validating enactment is effective only if the legislature has competence and the statutory defect identified in the earlier decision is actually cured; merely deeming the legal consequence without satisfying the mandatory municipal inclusion requirements is insufficient. Because the prescribed steps for including Raipura and Ummedganj within the Kota municipal limits had not been followed, the validating Act did not remove the foundational illegality. The earlier defect therefore remained, the octroi levy based on that inclusion could not be sustained, and refund of octroi paid after the exempted period with interest was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>