https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170204 The Government upheld the rejection of rebate claims in a case involving non-compliance with direct export requirements, incorrect mention of rebate sanctioning authority, goods cleared without payment of duty under bond, export of goods after the expiry of six months from removal, and non-submission of triplicate copies of ARE-1. The Government found no merit in the Revision Applications and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to reject all rebate claims. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 May 2015 10:54:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170204 The Government upheld the rejection of rebate claims in a case involving non-compliance with direct export requirements, incorrect mention of rebate sanctioning authority, goods cleared without payment of duty under bond, export of goods after the expiry of six months from removal, and non-submission of triplicate copies of ARE-1. The Government found no merit in the Revision Applications and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to reject all rebate claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170204