https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170210 On an application to revoke leave under clause 12 of the Letters Patent, the Court held that the plaint allegations had to be assumed true, so pleaded jurisdictional facts within the Calcutta jurisdiction could not be rejected at that stage. Questions about the validity of presentation of documents under a letter of credit and the role of the advising bank involved mixed issues of law and fact and had to go to trial. The balance of convenience also did not justify refusal of the chosen forum. The order revoking leave was unsustainable, and the suit was entitled to proceed in the Calcutta High Court. en-us Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170210 On an application to revoke leave under clause 12 of the Letters Patent, the Court held that the plaint allegations had to be assumed true, so pleaded jurisdictional facts within the Calcutta jurisdiction could not be rejected at that stage. Questions about the validity of presentation of documents under a letter of credit and the role of the advising bank involved mixed issues of law and fact and had to go to trial. The balance of convenience also did not justify refusal of the chosen forum. The order revoking leave was unsustainable, and the suit was entitled to proceed in the Calcutta High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170210