<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 631 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259757</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee/appellant regarding the classification of pressure and non-pressure parts cleared from the factory. The Court clarified that if excise duty was not demanded in the show cause notice, the direction in the Tribunal&#039;s order to determine and recover duty from the appellant would not apply. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on the value of bought out items in relation to the assessable value of boilers was upheld, emphasizing the essential nature of these parts for the functioning of a boiler. The appeals were dismissed, with the condition that duty must have been demanded for the jurisdictional officer to proceed with recovery from the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 631 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259757</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee/appellant regarding the classification of pressure and non-pressure parts cleared from the factory. The Court clarified that if excise duty was not demanded in the show cause notice, the direction in the Tribunal&#039;s order to determine and recover duty from the appellant would not apply. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on the value of bought out items in relation to the assessable value of boilers was upheld, emphasizing the essential nature of these parts for the functioning of a boiler. The appeals were dismissed, with the condition that duty must have been demanded for the jurisdictional officer to proceed with recovery from the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>