<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 629 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259755</link>
    <description>Pallets manufactured and used captively in a factory were held classifiable as other articles of iron or steel under Heading 7326.90, not as parts of fork-lift trucks under Heading 84.31, because an item used with machinery does not become a machinery part merely by such use and the trucks remained operational without the pallets. The pallets also failed to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE because they were not capital goods under Rule 57Q and their use as material-handling devices was not use in or in relation to manufacture of final products. Both the classification claim and the exemption claim were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 629 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259755</link>
      <description>Pallets manufactured and used captively in a factory were held classifiable as other articles of iron or steel under Heading 7326.90, not as parts of fork-lift trucks under Heading 84.31, because an item used with machinery does not become a machinery part merely by such use and the trucks remained operational without the pallets. The pallets also failed to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE because they were not capital goods under Rule 57Q and their use as material-handling devices was not use in or in relation to manufacture of final products. Both the classification claim and the exemption claim were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>