https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170197 The High Court allowed the petitions, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the Appellate Tribunal to reconsider the matters based on consistent precedents set by other Benches. The Court found discrepancies in the imposition of pre-deposit requirements by different Benches, leading to confusion and unjust dismissal of appeals. By remanding the cases for fresh adjudication in line with decisions from other Benches, the Court aimed to ensure fair treatment and consistency in handling similar cases. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 May 2015 17:43:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170197 The High Court allowed the petitions, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the Appellate Tribunal to reconsider the matters based on consistent precedents set by other Benches. The Court found discrepancies in the imposition of pre-deposit requirements by different Benches, leading to confusion and unjust dismissal of appeals. By remanding the cases for fresh adjudication in line with decisions from other Benches, the Court aimed to ensure fair treatment and consistency in handling similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170197