https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170183 Writ locus standi is treated broadly in challenges alleging illegality, so a petition need not fail merely because the petitioner is not a direct rival trader. On the substantive rule point, the proviso to Rule 6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974 is confined to removal within the limits of that sub-rule and cannot be stretched to authorise shifting a foreign liquor shop to a different range outside the notified limits. The text also states that wider transfer power is reserved under Rule 6(3) for specified circumstances, so a shift beyond the notified area would be without authority of law. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 May 2015 11:50:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170183 Writ locus standi is treated broadly in challenges alleging illegality, so a petition need not fail merely because the petitioner is not a direct rival trader. On the substantive rule point, the proviso to Rule 6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974 is confined to removal within the limits of that sub-rule and cannot be stretched to authorise shifting a foreign liquor shop to a different range outside the notified limits. The text also states that wider transfer power is reserved under Rule 6(3) for specified circumstances, so a shift beyond the notified area would be without authority of law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170183