<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 968 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170174</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the decision, rejecting the revision application as devoid of merit. The failure to export within the stipulated time and non-compliance with mandatory conditions led to the inadmissibility of the rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 968 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170174</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the decision, rejecting the revision application as devoid of merit. The failure to export within the stipulated time and non-compliance with mandatory conditions led to the inadmissibility of the rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>