https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170175 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request to revoke the attachment of properties, emphasizing the need to safeguard the Revenue's interests due to the appellant's failure to disclose material facts. The Tribunal extended the deadline for complying with the stay order and scheduled the case for compliance. The decision was based on concerns that releasing the properties could allow the appellant to evade payment, highlighting the importance of transparency and protecting the Revenue's interests. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2015 18:02:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170175 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request to revoke the attachment of properties, emphasizing the need to safeguard the Revenue's interests due to the appellant's failure to disclose material facts. The Tribunal extended the deadline for complying with the stay order and scheduled the case for compliance. The decision was based on concerns that releasing the properties could allow the appellant to evade payment, highlighting the importance of transparency and protecting the Revenue's interests. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170175