https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259720 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for the pre-deposit of Rs. 150 crores, finding no substantial question of law warranting interference. The Court noted that the Tribunal appropriately exercised its discretion under Section 35F of the Act, considering undue hardship and safeguarding the Revenue's interest. The Court granted the appellant three months to comply with the pre-deposit order. Appeals were dismissed, with the Court clarifying that the observations made would not impact the case's merits during the final hearing. en-us Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259720 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for the pre-deposit of Rs. 150 crores, finding no substantial question of law warranting interference. The Court noted that the Tribunal appropriately exercised its discretion under Section 35F of the Act, considering undue hardship and safeguarding the Revenue's interest. The Court granted the appellant three months to comply with the pre-deposit order. Appeals were dismissed, with the Court clarifying that the observations made would not impact the case's merits during the final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259720