<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 593 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259719</link>
    <description>Welding electrodes used only for repair and maintenance of factory machinery were held too remote from manufacture to qualify as MODVAT inputs under Rule 57A read with Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The same reasoning was applied under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, where the definitions of capital goods and input did not bring such electrodes within the eligible category. Credit was therefore disallowed under both regimes because goods used merely for maintenance lacked the direct or sufficiently proximate nexus required for excise credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 593 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259719</link>
      <description>Welding electrodes used only for repair and maintenance of factory machinery were held too remote from manufacture to qualify as MODVAT inputs under Rule 57A read with Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The same reasoning was applied under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, where the definitions of capital goods and input did not bring such electrodes within the eligible category. Credit was therefore disallowed under both regimes because goods used merely for maintenance lacked the direct or sufficiently proximate nexus required for excise credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>