<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 583 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the income of a non-resident company should be taxed under Section 44BB rather than Section 44DA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It also ruled that interest under Section 234B could not be levied on the assessee. The issue of including unpaid invoices in gross revenues for computing presumptive income under Section 44BB was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The appeal by the Assessing Officer was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 583 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the income of a non-resident company should be taxed under Section 44BB rather than Section 44DA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It also ruled that interest under Section 234B could not be levied on the assessee. The issue of including unpaid invoices in gross revenues for computing presumptive income under Section 44BB was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The appeal by the Assessing Officer was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>