<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 580 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259706</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim under Section 54B. The investment in agricultural land was made within the extended due date for filing the return under Section 139(4), leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 580 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259706</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim under Section 54B. The investment in agricultural land was made within the extended due date for filing the return under Section 139(4), leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>