https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259702 The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions made by the AO. The first issue involved income from undisclosed sources, where the CIT(A) found the cash deposits were legitimate expenses for drivers. The second issue concerned unexplained shares, which the CIT(A) confirmed were inherited. The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating the AO lacked justification for the additions. The order was pronounced on 10/04/2015. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 May 2015 00:10:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259702 The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions made by the AO. The first issue involved income from undisclosed sources, where the CIT(A) found the cash deposits were legitimate expenses for drivers. The second issue concerned unexplained shares, which the CIT(A) confirmed were inherited. The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating the AO lacked justification for the additions. The order was pronounced on 10/04/2015. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259702