<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 569 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259695</link>
    <description>Welding electrodes do not qualify as capital goods or as components, spares or accessories of capital goods for MODVAT/CENVAT credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Applying the ordinary meaning of &quot;component&quot;, the court treated a component as an integral and necessary part of the specified machinery, without which the whole is incomplete. Electrodes used for welding, repair and maintenance were held to be incidental consumables rather than constituent parts of the machinery or of the manufacturing process. Credit was therefore not available on this basis, and the authorities&#039; contrary references to other statutory settings did not alter that result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 569 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259695</link>
      <description>Welding electrodes do not qualify as capital goods or as components, spares or accessories of capital goods for MODVAT/CENVAT credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Applying the ordinary meaning of &quot;component&quot;, the court treated a component as an integral and necessary part of the specified machinery, without which the whole is incomplete. Electrodes used for welding, repair and maintenance were held to be incidental consumables rather than constituent parts of the machinery or of the manufacturing process. Credit was therefore not available on this basis, and the authorities&#039; contrary references to other statutory settings did not alter that result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>