<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 564 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259690</link>
    <description>Writ relief was declined on the service tax dispute, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the reply already filed before the competent authority. The authority was to afford an opportunity of hearing and then consider liability and, if necessary, quantification of the demand. The Court did not decide the merits of taxability, and all contentions were expressly left open for departmental determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 18:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 564 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259690</link>
      <description>Writ relief was declined on the service tax dispute, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the reply already filed before the competent authority. The authority was to afford an opportunity of hearing and then consider liability and, if necessary, quantification of the demand. The Court did not decide the merits of taxability, and all contentions were expressly left open for departmental determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>