<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 924 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170168</link>
    <description>The Government allowed the revision applications, setting aside the impugned orders and ruling in favor of the applicant. The decision clarified that the rebate claim for Central Excise duty on exported goods was admissible under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment emphasized the consistent practice of crediting duty amounts to the merchant exporter and the lack of dispute regarding the export of duty-paid goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 17:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 924 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170168</link>
      <description>The Government allowed the revision applications, setting aside the impugned orders and ruling in favor of the applicant. The decision clarified that the rebate claim for Central Excise duty on exported goods was admissible under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment emphasized the consistent practice of crediting duty amounts to the merchant exporter and the lack of dispute regarding the export of duty-paid goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>