https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170160 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority exceeded its jurisdiction by imposing penalties on the appellant for alleged misdeclaration of goods, despite the certificate issued by CTEPC clarifying no misdeclaration. The order directing reconsideration based on the CTEPC certificate was final and unchallenged, leading to the decision to overturn the penalties imposed. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2015 14:39:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170160 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority exceeded its jurisdiction by imposing penalties on the appellant for alleged misdeclaration of goods, despite the certificate issued by CTEPC clarifying no misdeclaration. The order directing reconsideration based on the CTEPC certificate was final and unchallenged, leading to the decision to overturn the penalties imposed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170160