https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170159 A request to keep the matter back was rejected where the Departmental Representative cited traffic delay, as the Tribunal held that foreseeable public-event disruptions did not excuse non-appearance and Government staff were expected to make timely attendance arrangements. The Tribunal then proceeded to hear the matter on merits, disposed of the application without insisting on any deposit, and directed the Registry to list the appeal for final disposal forthwith. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2015 14:31:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170159 A request to keep the matter back was rejected where the Departmental Representative cited traffic delay, as the Tribunal held that foreseeable public-event disruptions did not excuse non-appearance and Government staff were expected to make timely attendance arrangements. The Tribunal then proceeded to hear the matter on merits, disposed of the application without insisting on any deposit, and directed the Registry to list the appeal for final disposal forthwith. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170159