<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170142</link>
    <description>Laminated films used to manufacture pouches for packing supari did not give rise to irregular credit when the packed goods were returned under Rule 16 for re-processing. Once the pouches were used in clearance of the final product, they lost separate identity and could not be artificially segregated from the supari for the purpose of demanding reversal or duty under credit-reversal provisions. The credit taken on the laminated films was lawfully utilised in manufacture, so no irregular availment or utilisation was established. The resulting duty demand was unsustainable and the penalty could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 11:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170142</link>
      <description>Laminated films used to manufacture pouches for packing supari did not give rise to irregular credit when the packed goods were returned under Rule 16 for re-processing. Once the pouches were used in clearance of the final product, they lost separate identity and could not be artificially segregated from the supari for the purpose of demanding reversal or duty under credit-reversal provisions. The credit taken on the laminated films was lawfully utilised in manufacture, so no irregular availment or utilisation was established. The resulting duty demand was unsustainable and the penalty could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>