<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1297 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170131</link>
    <description>Serious deficiencies in a criminal investigation, including delay in apprehending key accused and inconsistencies in the prosecution&#039;s approach, justified judicial intervention to preserve confidence in the criminal process and prevent miscarriage of justice. The Supreme Court held that, in an exceptional case, the trial could be transferred and the investigation monitored to secure a fair and effective prosecution; the pending sessions case was transferred to Calcutta and CBI investigation was continued under close oversight. However, the Court declined to quash the charge-sheets or order a de novo investigation by a special investigation team or other independent agency, considering continued investigation by the existing agency sufficient at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 14:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1297 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170131</link>
      <description>Serious deficiencies in a criminal investigation, including delay in apprehending key accused and inconsistencies in the prosecution&#039;s approach, justified judicial intervention to preserve confidence in the criminal process and prevent miscarriage of justice. The Supreme Court held that, in an exceptional case, the trial could be transferred and the investigation monitored to secure a fair and effective prosecution; the pending sessions case was transferred to Calcutta and CBI investigation was continued under close oversight. However, the Court declined to quash the charge-sheets or order a de novo investigation by a special investigation team or other independent agency, considering continued investigation by the existing agency sufficient at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>