<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259688</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner&#039;s representation seeking a refund of tax under TNVAT and CST Acts within three weeks. The judgment focused solely on this direction, emphasizing the limited scope of the mandamus relief sought by the petitioner. No costs were imposed in the disposal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 07:32:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259688</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner&#039;s representation seeking a refund of tax under TNVAT and CST Acts within three weeks. The judgment focused solely on this direction, emphasizing the limited scope of the mandamus relief sought by the petitioner. No costs were imposed in the disposal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>