<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c). It held that tenancy rights do not qualify as intangible assets for depreciation but allowed depreciation at the rate applicable to buildings, considering the tenancy rights as tangible assets. The decision was pronounced on 24/04/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 07:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c). It held that tenancy rights do not qualify as intangible assets for depreciation but allowed depreciation at the rate applicable to buildings, considering the tenancy rights as tangible assets. The decision was pronounced on 24/04/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>